Over time, LGBT representation in Television has grown, and has become better written too. In the past, representations would be few and far between, and not all of them would necessarily be positive. A big reason for this could simply be that people did not wish to see positive representations of LGBT characters in Television. This evolution is shown in the stimulus material. A 1987 episode of Eastenders was heavily criticised by members of parliament for showing scene featuring a gay kiss. Many people complained and condemned the show, saying that if doesn't show such acts after watershed, then it should be scrapped altogether. The outcry was made, but was ignored. However, not many other shows were looking to receive such a backlash. Other similar events occurred on television, but the majority happened after watershed. In fact, the first lesbian kiss pre-watershed didn't happen until a 1994 episode of Brookside. In 2005, the revived Doctor Who introduced new character Captain Jack Harkness. His exact sexuality is never labelled, but he shares on screen kisses with both male and female characters, and in the 2006 show Torchwood, he is shown having relationships with male and female characters. Jack Harkness was an effective representation due to how much his character steered away from stereotypes. Jack was a witty action hero and also a positive role model for younger viewers. In 2013, streaming service Netflix debuted their new show Orange Is The New Black, a show following a woman being sentenced to prison and what life is like inside. Many of the characters in the show are apart of the LGBT community, and are shown dealing with different hardships as they navigate life in prison. The show features many lesbian characters and a transgender character, which isn't very common for such a flagship show. Orange Is The New Black has been tremendously received by fans and critics, even winning many awards over it's runtime, for its realistic portrayal of LGBT characters, people in prison and more.
In my primary research, I looked at the long running American sitcom It's Always Sunny (2005-) In Philadelphia, specifically the character of Mac. Mac is a stereotypically conservative and religious man, who condemns homosexuality for the majority of the show's seasons, until coming out as gay in the finale of season 11, which aired in 2016. Mac's character coming out as gay had a mixed reaction. An article from The Independent criticised it because of how it has became a trope. Many different pieces of media have a homophobic character who is secretly gay (Thirteen Reasons Why, Hollyoaks, The Perks Of Being A Wallflower) and a lot of people are sick of it, as they view it as a lazy and unoriginal way to introduce a gay character. Many others however, praised the show for the representation, and how Mac discovering his sexuality didn't change who he was as a character. The show met high praise for the Season Thirteen finale titled Mac Finds His Pride. Mac and the other cast members are taking part in a pride parade and have their own float, but Mac won't do the parade until he finds his own pride in himself. Mac and the character Frank, who claims he "doesn't get it" when regarding Mac's sexuality, embark on helping Mac understand himself. After many failures, the show comes to a close with Mac coming out to his father with a five minute dance sequence held in-front of prison inmates and Frank. The dance, featuring a ballet dancer representing a holy figure, shows how Mac suffered internal hatred due to how heavily religious he was, and how although he knew he was gay, he still thought it was wrong. We see him grow, and learn to love himself while still able to love god, as he accepts that god would accept him. During the dance, Mac's father leaves, but Mac continues dancing. He realises he doesn't need the validation from his father, because he finally has the validation from himself. Frank even has a realisation during the dance, being brought to tears and exclaiming "I get it". This scene resulted in show creator and actor for Mac, Rob McElhenney receiving tons of messages and letter from LGBT fans who felt moved and supported by the scene. This all culminates in Mac being a positive representation of the LGBT community, regardless of some of the more morally incorrect acts his character has committed over the show's runtime.
However, in my primary research I found some negative representations of the LGBT community in modern television. The animated sitcom Family Guy ran an episode in 2015 that opens with the main characters at a fair. The character known as Chris wins a prize at a game after knocking down cans with a ball. The prize he is given is a homosexual man. The man wears a stereotypically feminine outfit, with a pink shirt and scarf, and he also speaks with a stereotypically high-pitched voice. He has short dialogue with Chris where it is revealed that he feeds on attention to survive. This character isn't really much of a character, just a stereotype on screen to be laughed at. The character being nothing but potentially offensive and dangerous stereotypes and also only existing to be the butt of the joke is not a fair representation of the LGBT community. Without the stereotypes, the character isn't anything.
In my research, I have found that over the years, LGBT representation in Television has certainly grown, and while there are and probably always will be exceptions, there are a lot of positive representations that don't need to focus on stereotypes and can flesh out the sexuality of a character in a much better and more accurate way. Right now, around 10% of characters on television are LGBT, which when you think of how many characters must exist, is quite a large number, which will only grown even larger with time.
A change that could be made to ensure there are less negative representations is, if a Television show wishes to have an LGBT character, they should hire either an LGBT writer to help write their character and scenes, or maybe hire an LGBT actor to play the character and bring some realism to the role. Doing both would ensure the best results, as both parties could work together to ensure the character remains a positive representation and steers clear of stereotypes.
Some further research could certainly be conducted. Research should be taken into seeing how the LGBT community themselves react to all their different representations and how they feel about stereotypes in television. They can be asked if they feel they receive enough representation and if not, how much more they should receive. This would allow writers and producers of different shows to understand what they are doing right and what they are doing wrong when it comes to LGBT representation. This could result in more accurate characters, less stereotypes, and probably more characters in general.
In my research, I have found that over the years, LGBT representation in Television has certainly grown, and while there are and probably always will be exceptions, there are a lot of positive representations that don't need to focus on stereotypes and can flesh out the sexuality of a character in a much better and more accurate way. Right now, around 10% of characters on television are LGBT, which when you think of how many characters must exist, is quite a large number, which will only grown even larger with time.
A change that could be made to ensure there are less negative representations is, if a Television show wishes to have an LGBT character, they should hire either an LGBT writer to help write their character and scenes, or maybe hire an LGBT actor to play the character and bring some realism to the role. Doing both would ensure the best results, as both parties could work together to ensure the character remains a positive representation and steers clear of stereotypes.
Some further research could certainly be conducted. Research should be taken into seeing how the LGBT community themselves react to all their different representations and how they feel about stereotypes in television. They can be asked if they feel they receive enough representation and if not, how much more they should receive. This would allow writers and producers of different shows to understand what they are doing right and what they are doing wrong when it comes to LGBT representation. This could result in more accurate characters, less stereotypes, and probably more characters in general.